Indeed, both age and experience are highly essential to the workforce in any country. First, experience is important as in times of emergency or when somethings happens, the person will be able to handle the circumstances carefully and calmly, whereas a inexperience person would freak out due to his inability to control himself under these circumstances.
On the other hand, age is also very crucial. For example, a young man is stronger, more quick witted, and his hands are more steady, thus being able to act quickly and save a lot of precious time. However, a person in his 40s-60s would find it extremely difficult to act even with their experience over the past decades. These people's hands are not as steady and would also find it harder to remain their composure.
So, my suggestion is that experienced workers pair with the younger ones so that both experience and age would combine and make potential success.
Thus, both age and experience are important but when combined, they are even more powerful as one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Why don't you think of a way to benefit both age and experience?
For example, why not implement a system where aged people can provide support, instead being on the frontline workforce? While younger workers can do the hands-on work. This benefits both sides. Whenever the younger workers are unclear about something, they can consult the older workers, and yet since you said the older workers might be less efficient, the younger workers will do the jobs that require maximum efficency, so therefore, they both play an important role.
So in this case, it's not Age VS Experience anymore. It'd be Age + Experience = Potential success.
Yep I forgot to add in that. Thanks for reminding. But the main point of my post was actually that.I go edit now.
Post a Comment